Play two rounds and count
Count fairways hit and, more usefully, count the misses by side. A driver block starts from a pattern, and two rounds of honest counting describes your pattern better than any description of how it feels.
Every block below runs the same discipline: a fresh baseline, one variable moved at a time, and a card that reports the pattern instead of the best swing of the day. Nothing here is a shortened version of the individual block pages — it's the same testing, indexed so a full-bag client can move through the whole rotation without hunting for six different URLs.
Booking a single block reserves that block alone. Booking the full rotation reserves the whole afternoon and gets you one combined report at the end instead of six separate cards.
Hand somebody four drivers and forty balls and one of them will produce the longest shot of the afternoon. That tells you which driver caught the best swing. It does not tell you which driver you should own, and the two answers agree less often than anyone would like.
A driver spends its working life doing two jobs. Occasionally it produces a shot you remember all week. Far more often it decides whether your second shot is played from a fairway, from thick grass, or from a different hole entirely. The second job is worth several strokes a round and the first one is worth an anecdote.
So the driver block is built around dispersion. We capture where the ball finishes laterally, how wide the spread of that finish is, and how much carry survives on the strikes that were not clean. A candidate that gives up four yards on the middle of the face and holds twelve yards more on the heel side is the better club for almost every golfer who walks through the door, and the raw carry column will never say so on its own.
Impact tape goes on the face for every candidate. The photograph gets kept, the heel-to-toe and crown-to-sole spreads get measured with a scale, and both numbers appear on your card next to the launch data. When a shaft change tightens the strike pattern by four millimetres, that is a finding with a mechanism behind it rather than a lucky run of good contact.
Change two things at once and the sheet cannot say which one did the work. The sequence below is the whole reason a driver block takes ninety minutes rather than thirty.
Because it is free, because it changes the strike pattern more than any component swap, and because getting it wrong makes every later comparison noisy. We test in half-inch steps using the head you brought, and we watch the face tape rather than the carry column.
Heads differ in how much they resist twisting, where their mass sits, and how the face is curved. Those differences show up on mishits and hide on centre strikes, so this stage is read almost entirely from the off-centre column.
Candidates are chosen from the bench numbers, not the letters. Weight comes first because it changes tempo, then tip-zone stiffness, which is where launch and spin actually live. Two to four candidates, alternated against the baseline rather than hit in a row.
Last, because it is the finest adjustment and because it moves loft, lie and face angle together. We show you the chart, then we measure what actually happened rather than trusting the chart, which is not always the same thing.
There is a persistent idea that a driver fitting is a search for a published launch and spin combination. It is a tidy story and it falls apart the moment you notice that the published numbers were derived for a clubhead speed, an angle of attack and a ball that may have nothing to do with yours.
What actually matters is the relationship between the two on your delivery. A golfer swinging down on the ball needs loft from somewhere, and taking spin out of that flight without adding launch produces a ball that falls out of the sky early. A golfer swinging up has the opposite problem and the opposite solution. Chasing a spin figure in isolation is how people end up with drivers that measure beautifully in a room and lose thirty yards into a breeze.
So the card reports launch and spin together, with descent angle beside them, and marks all three as modelled where they are modelled. If the winning configuration gets there with more spin than the internet would recommend, and the dispersion and the descent angle are both better, that is the configuration we recommend and the card explains why.
A driver that is nine yards shorter and stays in play twice as often is not a compromise. It is the correct club, and the carry column will argue with you about it.
Roughly one driver block in five ends with us recommending nothing beyond a length change and a grip. That is a completed block, the paperwork is identical, and the fee is the same.
The full five-stage method →Count fairways hit and, more usefully, count the misses by side. A driver block starts from a pattern, and two rounds of honest counting describes your pattern better than any description of how it feels.
Including the one you are convinced is finished. Half the value of the block is the baseline, and a baseline taken on a loaner tells us nothing about the club currently in your bag.
A sleeve is enough. We run the block on a reference ball so results stay comparable across sessions, then repeat a short set with yours. Spin is where the difference shows up.
The club is easy from a peg and difficult from the ground, so a fitting that starts on a tee is answering the question nobody had. Every candidate here begins on the deck, and most of them never get teed up at all.
A fairway wood has a long shaft, a low centre of mass, and only about fifteen degrees of loft trying to lift a ball that is sitting on the ground. There is very little margin. Arrive a fraction steep and the leading edge digs; arrive a fraction shallow and the sole bounces into the equator of the ball. The window between those two failures is narrower than in any other full-swing club, and the shape of the sole is what widens or narrows it.
None of that is visible from a tee, which is why the tee comes out at the end of the block if it comes out at all. It is also only partly visible from a mat, because a mat lets a steep delivery skid into the ball instead of digging. So the candidate that survives the mat gets taken to the reference lane and hit off grass, and roughly one time in four the ranking changes when it gets there.
What we are watching for is not the best carry. It is the proportion of strikes that made clean contact at all, the depth and position of the entry mark, and whether the sole released out of the turf or dragged. Those three observations settle more fairway wood fittings than the launch monitor does.
Sole depth and camber decide how much error the club forgives on entry. There is no best shape, only a shape that matches how steeply you arrive and how firm the ground is where you play.
Sits low behind the ball and slides. Rewards a shallow, sweeping arrival and firm summer turf. Punishes a steep delivery, because there is very little curvature to lift the leading edge back out of the ground.
The same footprint with material removed at the heel so the club can sit slightly open without the toe lifting. Useful for golfers who deliver the club with the shaft leaning forward.
More curvature front to back, which means the effective leading edge sits higher when the club arrives steep. Wider turf window, marginally higher centre of mass, and the most commonly correct answer for a mid-handicap golfer.
Contact concentrated on two narrow strips, which reduces drag through longer grass. Genuinely helpful from rough and from soft spring lies, slightly less stable on firm ground.
Stock three woods run around forty-three inches. That length exists to protect a tee-shot carry number in a catalogue comparison, and it makes the club measurably harder to control from the ground. Taking half an inch out costs a yard or two of theoretical distance and typically tightens the strike pattern by several millimetres, which is worth considerably more than the yard.
Shaft weight tends to move upward too. A lighter shaft in a long club encourages the hands to throw the head at the ball early, which is exactly the delivery that produces the fat-then-thin alternation people complain about. Adding fifteen or twenty grams often steadies the low point without the golfer being able to say why.
Both changes get tested against your own club rather than assumed, and both go on the card with the before and after figures. If the shorter, heavier build does not beat what you brought, the card says so and you keep what you have.
The measurement that predicts fairway wood happiness best is not carry. It is the percentage of shots that came off the middle of the sole.
When weather closes the lane, the indoor half runs normally and the card is marked provisional. We will not sign off a fairway wood build on mat data alone, because the mat is the one surface that hides the fault we are trying to fix.
Why bay numbers and lane numbers differ →Any of those is a specific, measurable complaint, and specific complaints are what this block is built to answer. If instead the issue is that you would like more distance from a club you already strike well, say so on the phone, because that is a harder request and we will tell you honestly how much room there is.
If the answer might be a hybrid instead →This block is named after a product category and organised around a yardage. The question is what should cover the ground between your longest comfortable iron and your shortest reliable wood, and the honest answer is sometimes not a hybrid at all.
Before anything gets hit, we find the gap. Your longest iron that carries a repeatable distance, your shortest wood that you would use from a fairway, and the space in between. Sometimes that space is fourteen yards and there is no problem to solve. Frequently it is thirty-five, and occasionally it is fifty, which means a golfer has been playing two full clubs' worth of yardage with a swing adjustment.
Once the number exists, the candidates are chosen to cover it rather than to represent a category. A twenty-one degree hybrid, a four iron from a distance-oriented set, a driving iron, and a seven wood all live inside the same yardage band. They get very different ball flights there, and which one belongs in your bag depends on what you need the shot to do when it lands.
That last point is where most of the block's value sits. A driving iron that runs out to the same total as a hybrid is not the same club, because one of them stops on a green and the other one does not. Descent angle gets weighed as heavily as carry here, with the modelling clearly marked as modelling.
All four of these can be built to carry the same distance for the same golfer. What separates them is how the ball arrives, how they behave from a poor lie, and how much shot-shaping is available.
| Family | Flight | From thick rough | Workability | Suits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long iron | Lowest, flattest descent | Poor | Highest | Steeper deliveries, faster swings, firm ground |
| Driving iron | Low with more carry than a long iron | Below average | High | Golfers wanting a controllable tee club |
| Hybrid | Medium to high, steeper descent | Good | Moderate | The broad majority, especially from imperfect lies |
| Seven or nine wood | Highest, steepest descent | Very good | Lower | Shallow deliveries, slower swings, soft greens |
A hybrid replacing a four iron should be set up like a club you can hit from the ground, which means it usually wants to be shorter than the length it ships at. Stock hybrid lengths are built around a tee-shot use case and around the same catalogue distance pressure that inflates fairway wood lengths.
Lie angle matters here more than most people expect. A hybrid soled with a lie that suits a fairway wood arrives with the toe up for a golfer who stands to it like an iron, and the ball starts left of where it was aimed. We check dynamic lie on the sole board exactly the way we do for irons, and we bend hybrids that can be bent.
Shaft choice tends to follow the iron set rather than the wood set. Matching the hybrid shaft to the iron shaft weight, rather than to the driver, keeps the transition through the top of the bag from feeling like a different sport. Where a golfer's irons are graphite this is straightforward; where they are steel, we usually land on a heavier hybrid shaft than the stock option.
The finished spec is written to sit inside the ladder you already have. If it carries 197 and your five iron carries 183, the gap below it is now fourteen yards and the gap above it needs checking against your fairway wood. That whole ladder goes on the card.
If the ladder needs work below this club →Built half an inch to an inch under, with an iron-weight shaft and a bend to match the lie the golfer actually delivers. The single most common result and usually the cheapest.
Chosen for descent angle rather than carry. Golfers resist this one for a hole and a half and then stop mentioning it, according to the four-round follow-ups.
Around one block in five finds the real hole somewhere else, most often between the pitching wedge and the next wedge down. We say so and point you at the right block.
Fit a seven iron, order the rest to match, and you have optimised the middle of the set while leaving both ends to chance. Almost every gapping problem we measure was created that way, by people doing something entirely reasonable.
The first forty minutes of an iron block produce no recommendation at all. They produce a picture: what every iron in your bag currently carries, how tightly, and where the rungs of the ladder sit relative to each other. Until that exists, any component conversation is being had in the dark.
Gaps get built from carry medians rather than from the numbers on the soles, because the soles are describing a design intention and the medians are describing what happened. The difference is usually somewhere between mild and startling. A set stamped in four-degree steps can produce distance steps of six, nineteen, eleven and fourteen yards, and none of that is visible from the outside.
Once the map exists, the diagnosis is usually obvious and often cheap. Two clubs sitting on top of each other is frequently a loft problem rather than a set problem. A long iron that produces nothing is frequently a launch problem that a lighter shaft or a different head profile fixes. A short iron that flies a club too far is usually doing so because the loft is stronger than the stamp claims.
The figures below come from a bag we measured in March, printed with the owner's permission and with the brand removed. Nothing here was caused by damage or abuse. The set was four seasons old and had been bent once by somebody competent.
| Club | Stamped loft | Measured loft | Carry median | Step from previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 iron | 24.0 deg | 24.5 deg | 176 yd | — |
| 6 iron | 27.0 deg | 28.5 deg | 163 yd | 13 yd |
| 7 iron | 30.5 deg | 30.0 deg | 158 yd | 5 yd |
| 8 iron | 34.5 deg | 36.0 deg | 141 yd | 17 yd |
| 9 iron | 39.0 deg | 39.5 deg | 130 yd | 11 yd |
| Pitching wedge | 43.5 deg | 44.0 deg | 119 yd | 11 yd |
Static lie is measured on a fixture with the club soled flat. Dynamic lie is the angle at which the sole actually meets the ground during your swing, and it is the only version that affects where the ball starts. The two can differ by several degrees, particularly for taller golfers and for anyone whose hands are noticeably low or high at impact.
We read it from a sole and face board: a strip of impact material on the sole, a marked board under the ball, and a look at where the mark sits after the strike. Toe-first contact means the lie is too flat for you and the face is pointing right at separation. Heel-first means the reverse. The correction is a bend, it takes minutes, and it is measured before and after with both figures on the ticket.
Length interacts with all of it. Lengthening a club flattens the effective lie and moves strike toward the heel; shortening does the opposite. So we settle length first, then read dynamic lie against the length we are going to build, rather than fitting lie to the club you walked in with and then changing the club.
The whole set gets checked, not just the seven iron. Lie requirements drift through a set because the clubs are different lengths and you stand at a different distance to each one, which is precisely why manufacturers build a progression in and precisely why that progression may not be yours.
What the head and shaft numbers mean →Included in the block at no extra cost, because a gap map that stops at the five iron has not finished the job.
If your five iron carries within eight yards of your six and lands at a shallow angle, it has stopped being a scoring club. We measure it rather than assume it, and the replacement conversation belongs in the hybrid block rather than here.
Different head styles through one set are entirely sensible and slightly more work to build, because the loft and length progression has to be re-derived across the join rather than inherited from either family.
Modern pitching wedge lofts have moved a long way. The gap between the set wedge and the next one down is now the widest hole in most bags, and it is a wedge block question, so we flag it and stop.
Hit twenty full sand wedges into a screen and you have learned about one shot you play perhaps three times a round. The shots that decide the scorecard are the half swing from ninety yards, the pitch off a tight lie, and the bunker shot you are dreading.
The full swing. The only one a launch monitor is genuinely well suited to. We measure it for gapping purposes, because the distance a wedge carries at full effort sets where the top of the short-game ladder sits, and because that number is what the iron block hands over.
The partial swing. Between fifty and ninety yards, where the club is being throttled rather than swung. Spin behaviour changes here in ways the full-swing data does not predict, and the leading edge and bounce combination decides whether a slightly heavy strike is a good shot or a disaster.
The tight lie. Firm, closely mown, no cushion under the ball. This is where bounce and leading edge height either save you or produce a blade over the green, and it is the shot most golfers describe when they say they do not trust their wedges.
The bunker shot. Run in real sand, from buckets we keep sorted by course, because the coarse sand at one club and the fine sand fifteen minutes away want different soles and every chart on the subject assumes an average that neither of them is.
Not handicap, and not the number of times you have been told that high bounce is for beginners. Bounce is a relationship between how you deliver the club and what the ground under it is doing.
A golfer who takes a deep divot with a sand wedge is presenting the leading edge downward and needs sole material behind it to stop the club digging. A shallow, sweeping delivery needs the opposite, because a wide bouncy sole will skid into the middle of the ball.
Oklahoma summers produce firm, thin lies on bermuda that punish a wide sole. Spring is softer and more forgiving of one. Most golfers here are better served fitting for the firm months, since that is when the mis-hit is least survivable.
Opening the face adds effective bounce, sometimes dramatically. A golfer who plays every greenside shot square needs the bounce built into the sole; one who opens the club for anything delicate is adding it themselves and should start from less.
| Delivery | Typical divot | Starting bounce | Grind character |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steep | Deep, ball-then-turf | 12 to 14 deg | Full sole, minimal relief |
| Moderate | Shallow bruise | 8 to 12 deg | Some heel relief, mild camber |
| Shallow | Little or none | 4 to 8 deg | Heel and trailing edge relieved |
| Mixed, opens the face | Varies by shot | 6 to 10 deg | Versatile grind, narrow sole |
Fresh grooves matter most on the shots where something sits between the face and the ball: wet grass, a flyer lie, a ball with a scuff on it. From a clean, dry, tight lie the face texture and the loft are doing most of the work, and a two-season-old wedge in reasonable condition is not the reason a pitch ran through the green.
What we can measure is the decline. A wedge face gets photographed and the groove edge radius recorded at the fitting, which gives a reference point for later. When somebody comes back eighteen months on convinced the wedge has gone flat, we can compare rather than guess, and about half the time the wedge is fine and the ball model changed.
Ball choice moves wedge spin more than most component changes do. A firm distance ball and a soft urethane ball can differ by well over a thousand revolutions on a partial wedge shot, which is a bigger effect than any grind on this page. Bring a sleeve of what you play and we will measure both.
Nearly every golfer who tells us their wedges have stopped spinning has changed something other than the wedges.Why spin figures carry the widest bands →
Bring every wedge you own including the pitching wedge from your set, a sleeve of your ball, and the shoes you play in, because the bunker and tight-lie work happens outside whenever the lane is open.
Expect fewer full swings than you are used to in a fitting and a lot more short ones. Expect to spend fifteen minutes in sand. Expect at least one moment where a wedge you assumed was the problem turns out to be fine and the one next to it in the bag is the culprit.
The card carries carry medians for the full and partial shots, an effective bounce figure for each candidate rather than the stamped one, a note on your delivery, and a build spec including grind, loft, lie, length and grip. Bench regrinding is available on wedges you already own where the geometry allows it.
Who runs this block →It was designed to track a ball travelling at a hundred and forty miles an hour through open air. Asked to describe a ball rolling at four, it produces numbers with error bars wider than the differences anyone is trying to measure. So we use something else.
The roll rig measures what happens in the first three feet after impact: how far the ball skids before it starts rolling forward, whether it hops, and how much sideways energy it picked up from a face that was not square. Skid distance is the number that separates putters far more reliably than anything printed on a spec sheet, and it responds strongly to loft, shaft lean and where on the face the ball was struck.
The stroke camera runs at a high enough frame rate to see the face rotating through the stroke rather than inferring it from start and end positions. What comes out is an arc: how far inside the line the head travels back, how much the face rotates relative to that arc, and where the low point of the stroke sits relative to the ball.
The eleven-foot surface is exactly that. A rolled and measured strip of putting surface at a length long enough to expose a start-line error and short enough that everybody in the room has a genuine opinion about whether it should have gone in. Everything on the card is checked against results on that strip.
Standard putter length exists because retail racks need to hold something. It fits a narrow band of human beings and everybody else adapts their posture to the club, which is exactly backwards.
We set you into a comfortable, repeatable posture without a putter in your hands, measure from the crease of the hand to the ground, and build from there. The putter is cut to the posture. A putter an inch too long pushes the hands out and the eyes inside the line, which produces a reliable push that no amount of aim adjustment fixes.
With the length correct, we check where your eyes sit relative to the ball and then measure where you actually aim using a laser on the head. Aim error and perceived aim disagree for most golfers, and the size of that disagreement changes with head shape and sight-line style rather than with effort.
The camera describes your natural stroke arc. Head balance is then matched to it: face balanced for a stroke that stays close to straight, progressively more toe hang as the arc opens up. Matching these is not a preference question, it is the difference between a face that returns square on its own and one that needs timing.
Heavier heads suit slower surfaces and shorter strokes; lighter heads suit fast greens where the stroke is already delicate. We ask which courses you play, set the strip to a comparable speed, and test two or three head weights against it. This stage changes distance control more than anything else in the block.
Loft is set against your shaft lean at impact so the ball starts rolling rather than hopping. Lie is set so the sole meets the surface flat, since a toe-up putter aims left before you have done anything. Grip size and shape come last and change how much the hands can rotate the face.
It can fix aim. Aim error is measurable, it is largely a function of head design and eye position, and correcting it is the single most reliable improvement available in this block. Golfers who aim two degrees right and compensate with a pull are extremely common and the compensation is never perfectly consistent.
It can improve start line by matching hang to arc, and it can improve distance control by matching head weight to the speeds you actually putt on. Both of those show up in the four-round follow-up more often than not.
It cannot fix green reading, and it cannot fix a stroke that changes shape under pressure. If the camera shows a stroke with no repeatable pattern at all, we will say so and suggest the money is better spent elsewhere. That happens perhaps one block in ten, and we would rather say it than sell a putter into it.
Most golfers do not need a different putter. They need the one they have to be an inch shorter, two degrees flatter, and aimed where they think it is aimed.
Length, lie and loft corrections on your existing putter are bench work and can usually be done the same afternoon. Roughly four putter blocks in ten end that way.
Bench rates for putter work →Six blocks back to back runs a full afternoon with a break built in around block four. Most golfers doing the whole bag split it across two visits rather than one long sitting — either way, Wendell blocks the calendar and works from a single intake sheet for all six.